<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dt:topic xmlns:dt="http://www.imsglobal.org/xsd/imsdt_v1p0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><title><![CDATA[Lesson Seven Class Discussion]]></title><text texttype="text/html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><span new="" times=""><font color="#000000">Please participate in the Lesson Seven class discussion.</font></span></span></p>

<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">Comment on the following quote from Dr. Ullman: &ldquo;Any explanation of Christ must explain the rise of worship.&nbsp; They saw Him as more than a revolutionary.&rdquo;</span></p>

<p><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">Dr. Ullman pointed to a better translation of the Greek word &ldquo;monogenes,&rdquo; that this word does not mean &ldquo;only begotten,&rdquo; but means &ldquo;only of a kind&rdquo; or &ldquo;unique.&rdquo;&nbsp; However, if Christ is &ldquo;Son,&rdquo; then is it possible that He is, in fact, eternally generated as the Early Church fathers believed?</span></p>
]]></text></dt:topic>
